Congress has been promised fresh details this Tuesday on last year’s shocking allegations of an illegal UFO crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program.

The charges, made by former high-ranking US intelligence official David Grusch, accuse both the US military and its defense contractors of stonewalling on evidence of crashed UFOs, recovered ‘beings,’ and even UFO-related deaths.

While Americans wait in anticipation for possible new details, a source with direct knowledge of standard operations inside the US Intelligence Community’s Inspector General’s office (IC IG) told DailyMail.com that the meeting will be ‘only for show.’

‘The IG, when he goes and briefs Oversight, his job, between you and I, is going to be to make them feel as though they’re getting information,’ this source said, ‘and basically tell them nothing.’

Although some House Oversight members intimated last November that they have now acquired ‘permission’ to view the classified version of Grusch’s formal IC IG complaint, this source said: ‘I do not expect that to occur.’ 

Grusch’s allegations were first made in detail via this classified formal complaint, a ‘Disclosure of Urgent Concern(s); Complaint of Reprisal’ filed to the IC IG’s office in May of 2022, according to The Debrief.

But this past June, Grusch made public the unclassified, broad strokes of his charges in an explosive series of interviews, first with The Debrief, then cable news channel News Nation and soon after in sworn testimony to the House Oversight committee.   

‘I was informed, in the course of my official duties, of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program,’ Grusch told House members last July.

‘I made the decision, based on the data I collected, to report this information to my superiors and multiple inspectors general,’ Grusch continued, under oath, ‘in effect becoming a whistleblower.’

If he knowingly provided false material to the IC IG in his formal complaint, Grusch could face a fine of up to $10,000 for such a criminal offense, under Title 18 § 1001 of the US criminal code, or worse, up to five years in prison (or both).

‘Given the significant penalties for making false statements to an inspector general,’ as ex-Defense Department official Marik von Rennenkampff, wrote in The Hill, ‘it is extremely unlikely that multiple high-level, highly-cleared officials would falsely claim to have first-hand knowledge of myths and rumors.’

Read More Here